It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously (2025)

Quick Links

  • Intel GPUs Are Often Value Kings

  • Intel's Upscaling Is Actually Good

  • Intel Arc Can Even Do Ray Tracing

  • There Are Still Some Issues With Gaming on Intel GPUs

  • When Brands Compete, Users Win

Key Takeaways

  • Intel Arc GPUs offer great value compared to NVIDIA and AMD cards, providing a similar gaming experience for lower prices.
  • Intel's Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) upscaling is on par with DLSS and FSR.
  • Intel Arc GPUs can compete in ray tracing, making them a strong, budget-conscious option for gamers who want ray tracing.

It's been a couple of years since Intel released its first generation of dedicated "Arc" GPUs in March 2022. After a rocky launch, driver updates have fixed numerous issues, and these GPUs are now at an all-time low in terms of price. So, are Intel Arc GPUs finally worth picking over the juggernauts that are NVIDIA and AMD?

Intel GPUs Are Often Value Kings

Traditionally, AMD GPUs were focused on the low- and mid-market segments, while NVIDIA dominated the high-end with cards like the original GTX Titan and, most recently, the RTX 4090. You can still get cheaper NVIDIA cards if you want slightly better FPS, DLSS, and ray-tracing, but you generally get worse value in terms of FPS per dollar.

Intel never intended to compete with NVIDIA with Arc GPUs; I think its goal was to out-price AMD while providing a similar gaming experience. As an example, the top-of-the-line Intel Arc A770 16GB GPU is roughly on par with the NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti and AMD 7600 XT, so it's not even close to the high-end segment. The weakest Intel Arc GPU, the A310, is so weak that it can barely run triple-A titles at medium settings, so it's a few generations behind cheap AMD and NVIDIA cards.

What Intel Arc excels at is value. At the time of writing, the Intel Arc A750 is $189.99 on Newegg and $199.99 on Amazon. The AMD RX 7600 is $254.99 on Newegg and $227.91 on Amazon, and the RTX 4060 is $293.00 on Newegg and $289.49 on Amazon. These three cards trade blows in gaming benchmarks, as shown in Gamers Nexus' video, but the A750 is by far the cheapest of the bunch. All three cards have 8GB of VRAM, so you're not paying extra to get more space for high-resolution textures and assets.

If we go even cheaper with the Intel Arc A580, which is $159.99 on both Newegg and Amazon, we can see that it's the only card that makes sense to buy. The closest competitors are the AMD RX 6600, which is $199.99 on Newegg and Amazon, and the RTX 2070 Super, which is $359.99 on Newegg and $274.99 on Amazon for an old, refurbished card. So, you're getting a better deal and a significantly newer card with the A580.

So, Intel Arc GPUs tend to be a smarter choice across the board if you want the best performance for your dollar. It's worth noting that prices for used GPUs could be significantly different, so if you don't mind a used GPU, check GPU prices on your favorite online marketplaces as well.

It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously (1)

Intel's Upscaling Is Actually Good

While Intel was late to the GPU game, it wasn't late to advanced upscaling algorithms. Intel Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) is just as good as AMD FSR and NVIDIA DLSS. While DLSS is the king of upscaling, XeSS is surprisingly much better than AMD FSR in terms of image quality, especially after XeSS 1.3 added AI enhancements.

It's also worth noting that XeSS gives a more significant performance uplift on Intel Arc GPUs than on NVIDIA and AMD. If you've tried XeSS on a non-Intel GPU and liked it, you'll like it even more on an Intel Arc. The silver lining is that upscaling works best at 1440p and sharper resolutions, but Intel doesn't have high-end cards that can reliably run triple-A games at 60+ FPS at resolutions above 1080p.

Intel Arc Can Even Do Ray Tracing

It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously (2)

Ray tracing isn't a gimmick; enabling ray tracing in games that support it improves the image quality like almost no other setting. It delivers realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections. If you like fancy eye candy and wouldn't mind sacrificing half your FPS, you should pay attention to ray tracing benchmarks.

Just like DLSS, NVIDIA is the king of ray tracing if price isn't a factor. AMD can also do ray tracing, but it doesn't feature hardware-level ray tracing cores like NVIDIA and Intel. These so-called "RT cores" are different from the standard GPU cores, as they're better optimized to handle ray tracing.

With that in mind, let's look at the Intel Arc A770, which is the highest-end Intel GPU. Thanks to its larger VRAM capacity of 16GB and dedicated RT cores, it can trade blows with the RX 6700XT and RTX 3060, as shown in Ancient Gameplays' benchmark. Note that the video is over a year old, so driver updates have likely improved performance even further.

RandomGaminginHD tested the cheaper Arc A750 against the similarly priced AMD RX 7600. While the A750 is slightly worse in Cyberpunk 2077 with the low RT preset, it smashes the AMD card in Minecraft with RTX, likely because it was better optimized for hardware-level ray tracing.

There Are Still Some Issues With Gaming on Intel GPUs

I've hinted at driver issues several times in the article already, so you can probably guess where I'm going with this. Intel Arc had numerous issues and bugs when it launched. We've only had two major GPU manufacturers (AMD and NVIDIA) for decades, so these two brands have had time to fine-tune their drivers.

Many driver updates later, Intel Arc GPUs are finally able to run games at a decent frame rate, as you were able to see in the benchmarks I referenced earlier. Arc struggles with older DirectX 9 and 11 games (such as Grand Theft Auto V), but Intel is actively working on fixing this. Also, Intel Arc GPUs still experience frequent crashes or serious FPS issues in certain games. An October 2023 update increased FPS by 149% in Starfield, but you could still get drops below 30 FPS in parts of New Atlantis.

Another notable issue is high power consumption when idle, which seems to be exacerbated if you have multiple displays connected to the GPU. Thankfully, Reddit users found a workaround to mitigate the issue.

When Brands Compete, Users Win

It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously (3)

Linus Tech Tips once argued that gamers should buy Intel Arc GPUs, not because they offer good performance for the dollar, but because we should support the "third" GPU manufacturer. This is both to mitigate shortages at a time when GPU supplies are limited and to encourage competition.

We've already seen what competition can do in the tech world. When AMD Ryzen CPUs were introduced at a time when Intel had a monopoly, Intel was forced to innovate in future CPU generations to compete on price and performance. If we collectively support Intel to release new dedicated GPUs, we'll see even lower prices and better performance across the board.

The good news is that Intel Arc GPUs are now a compelling option, especially for budget-conscious gamers. You can either get a significant performance uplift by jumping to a higher-tier Intel GPU or save $50–100 by opting for the Intel alternative.

  • Hardware
  • gpu
  • Intel

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Manage Your List

Follow

Followed

Follow with Notifications

Follow

Unfollow

Readers like you help support How-To Geek. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read More.

It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously (2025)

FAQs

It's Time to Start Taking Intel GPUs Seriously? ›

Intel Arc GPUs offer great value compared to NVIDIA and AMD cards, providing a similar gaming experience for lower prices. Intel's Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) upscaling is on par with DLSS and FSR. Intel Arc GPUs can compete in ray tracing, making them a strong, budget-conscious option for gamers who want ray tracing.

Will Intel ever compete with Nvidia? ›

The approach Intel is taking with AI gives them a reasonable chance of competing with Nvidia: they are not trying to replicate what Nvidia is doing,” Nguyen said.

Will Intel make high end GPUs? ›

Intel's next-generation graphics cards, codenamed Battlemage, are expected to arrive sometime in 2024. With Battlemage, Intel is expected to move up into the enthusiast portions of the market that its first-generation products avoided.

Will Intel stop making GPUs? ›

It now appears Intel is still planning to deliver on its road map, though. A slide shared with Japanese gaming outlet 4Gamer shows that Intel is planning to launch a next-gen GPU in 2024. This lines up with Intel's initial road map, which promised that gamers would see next-gen Battlemage GPUs some time in early 2024.

Are Intel GPUs good for gaming? ›

It is capable of playing many of the latest games at a mainstream 1080p resolution and usually without resorting to the lowest detail settings. The Swift Go laptop we tested did especially well in games that supported Intel XeSS.

Which company is growing faster Intel or Nvidia? ›

Analysts expect NVDA to grow at about 36% per year over the next five years, which is certainly above average. However, analysts expect INTC to grow by 43% per year over the same period.

Will Intel ever recover? ›

Given that the AI chip market is currently in its early phases of growth and is expected to grow at a nice pace for a long time, there is ample opportunity for Intel's DCAI business to improve further. Analysts are expecting Intel's earnings to increase at an annual rate of 37% over the next five years.

Is AMD surpassing Intel? ›

For years, Intel was the undisputed king of the CPU market. But in recent years, AMD has made significant gains, and in 2023, it surpassed Intel in market value. There are a number of factors that contributed to AMD's success.

Will EVGA make Intel GPU? ›

The company posted in its community forum, saying that it won't be making next-generation Nvidia graphics cards but will continue to sell and support “the existing current generation products.” According to Gamers Nexus, the company doesn't currently have plans to make AMD or Intel graphics cards.

Is Intel better than AMD GPU? ›

Ultimately, the battle between AMD and Intel isn't relevant to gaming laptops. They perform similarly and the differences that exist are often less important to your buying decision than a gaming laptop's other qualities, like its cooling system, display and, of course, its GPU. See our guide to gaming laptops vs.

Does Intel have a future? ›

Key Points. Intel's growth is expected to pick up nicely thanks to new catalysts. The company's new products could help it gain footing in lucrative markets and drive healthy earnings growth in the long run. Intel stock could sustain its impressive rally and head substantially higher by the end of the decade.

What will replace GPUs? ›

'AI Chips Will Eventually Replace GPUs and Even NVIDIA Knows This' CUDA has bloated over the years into a pretty large monster that can do a lot of different things, but it's become very unwieldy.

Why don't we replace CPUs with GPUs? ›

While GPUs can process data several orders of magnitude faster than a CPU due to massive parallelism, GPUs are not as versatile as CPUs. CPUs have large and broad instruction sets, managing every input and output of a computer, which a GPU cannot do.

Should I use Intel or Nvidia? ›

Who is the best GPU manufacturer? In general, NVIDIA tends to outshine AMD and Intel when it comes to graphics processors thanks to their powerful performance, excellent ray tracing, and 4K rendering. However, AMD's Ryzen Series of GPUs are also very powerful in their own right and tend to cost less than NVIDIA's GPUs.

Is an Intel GPU reliable? ›

✅ You want hardware ray tracing and upscaling: Intel's hardware ray tracing and AI processors are surprisingly powerful for a first-generation graphics card. Don't buy it if: ❌ You want to play older PC games: Intel's graphics driver has gotten much better, but it still lags behind Nvidia and AMD on older titles.

Is it better to run games on CPU or GPU? ›

Modern games are graphically demanding, and the GPU handles all graphics rendering and processing needed to display modern games. In contrast, the CPU's role is on core processing tasks. Pairing a mid-range CPU with a GPU tailored for games provides the best balance for optimal gaming.

Can Intel Gaudi 3 compete with Nvidia? ›

While Gaudi 3 can compare to Nvidia's H100 in terms of speed and power, it isn't fully comparable with Nvidia's new Blackwell GPU, according to industry analysts. "They're not 100% comparable," said Alvin Nguyen, an analyst at Forrester Research.

Who is the biggest competitor to Nvidia? ›

NVIDIA's competitors
  • NVIDIA.
  • Renesas Electronics.
  • Cisco.
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
  • Broadcom.
  • AMD.
  • Intel.
  • Qualcomm.

Which is a better investment Intel or Nvidia? ›

This chart indicates Intel's stock is trading at a significantly better value than Nvidia's, with a far lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-sales (P/S) ratio. Forward P/E is calculated by dividing a company's current share price by its estimated earnings per share.

Can you replace Intel with Nvidia? ›

The answer is yes, you can use a dedicated NVIDIA GPU over a tower desktop that has an integrated Intel GPU. First, make sure you have an available PCIe x16 slot for use. Then, check for compatibility with the chipset (nowadays it matters much more).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Greg O'Connell

Last Updated:

Views: 5763

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg O'Connell

Birthday: 1992-01-10

Address: Suite 517 2436 Jefferey Pass, Shanitaside, UT 27519

Phone: +2614651609714

Job: Education Developer

Hobby: Cooking, Gambling, Pottery, Shooting, Baseball, Singing, Snowboarding

Introduction: My name is Greg O'Connell, I am a delightful, colorful, talented, kind, lively, modern, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.